检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王希琳[1] 孙雨桐[1] 胡启洋 刘英丽[1] 黄海燕[1]
出 处:《大众科技》2016年第11期50-51,101,共3页Popular Science & Technology
基 金:广西壮族自治区卫生厅自筹经费科研项目(Z2012394)
摘 要:目的:比较温灸结合针刺疗法与单纯针刺法对椎动脉型颈椎病的疗效差异。方法:将60例确诊为椎动脉型颈椎病患者随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组选用温灸结合常规针刺疗法,对照组仅选用常规针刺疗法。两组均以7天为一疗程,3个疗程后评定疗效。结果:治疗组总有效率为90.00%,对照组总有效率为73.33%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:温灸结合针刺疗法是治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的有效方法。Objective: To compare the therapeutic effects of Moxibustion combined with Auricular Pressure and pure auricular pressure therapy on the vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis. Method: 60 patients diagnosed with vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into treatment group and control group. The treatment group used of Moxibustion combined with Auricular Pressure with auricular pressure as the treatment method, the control group used pure auricular pressure as the treatment method. Two groups in 7 days for a period of treatment course and curative effect were evaluated after three treatment courses. Result :The total effective rate was 90.00% in the treatment group versus 73.33% in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05) .Conclusion: Moxibustion combined with Auricular Pressure is an effective way to treat the patients diagnosed with vertebral artery type of cervical spondylosis.
分 类 号:R245[医药卫生—针灸推拿学] R653[医药卫生—中医临床基础]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3