我国民事审级制度的改革重构——以案例指导制度的实践运行为切入  

The Reform and Reconstruction of Civil Case-Hearing Level System of Our Country——From A Point on the Practices of Case Guidance System

作　　者：陈树森[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院

出　　处：《理论界》2016年第11期57-64,共8页Theory Horizon

摘　　要：案例指导制度在我国已确立五年多,但其运行效果却不容乐观。究其原因,现行审级制度难以为指导性案例的生成及效力提供有效支撑是关键因素。为此,结合当前我国审级制度存在的上下级法院关系行政化、审级监督碎片化、事实问题与法律问题混同等问题,有必要在二审终审基础上增加独立的法律审程序,并就不同审级的法院设置不同的职能定位。Case guidance system in our country has been its running effect is not optimistic. The reason for that case-hearing level system to provide the effective guidance cases.Thus, considering the administration supervision of case -hearing level, the confusion current case -hearing level system, it is necessary established for more than is that it is difficult five yeats, but for the current supporting for the generation and effectiveness of between higher and lower court, fragmentation of between fact and legal issues etc existing in to add the independent legal review process on the basis of Two-Trial-For-Final, and establish the different functional position for the courts with different level of trial.

关 键 词：审级制度 案例指导制度 指导性案例 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]