美国间接购买者规则研究:警示与启示  

Study On Indirect Purchaser Rule:Warning and Enlightenment

作　　者：王磊[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期33-39,共7页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：间接购买者规则是美国反垄断私人诉讼中一个蛊惑的命题,它虽因剥夺间接购买者的起诉资格而饱受非议,但却被联邦最高法院一直采行。解读间接购买者规则能够为我国反垄断私人诉讼制度的完善提供一些经验与警示。我国在构建反垄断私人诉讼的具体制度设计时,需注重诉讼效率,合理平衡"威慑"与"补偿"的双重目标,可尝试从原告、法院这两个重要角度出发,并以证据与证明、团体诉讼、拓宽专业知识输入法院的渠道等为制度完善的突破口与着力点。Indirect Purchaser Rule is a puzzle in the US antitrust private litigation. Although it has been much maligned, the Supreme Court has still been using it. To interpret the indirect purchaser rule can provide the experience and the warning for the improvement of our antitrust private litigation. While designing a specific system of antitrust private litigation, we need to pay attention to the procedure efficiency, balancing the twin goals of ＂compensation＂ and ＂deterrence＂, and trying to start from the plaintiff and the court, both of whom play an important role in antitrust private litigation. We should focus on evidence and proof, group action, and broaden the channels through which professional knowledge enters the court, and so forth.

关 键 词：反垄断私人诉讼 间接购买者规则 威慑 补偿 效率 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]