斡旋受贿独立成罪的本质辨正与立法建构  

The Legislative Construction of the Independent Crime of Mediating Bribery

作　　者：孙道萃[1] SUN Dao - cui(College of Law, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学,广东广州510006

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2016年第5期79-86,共8页Journal of Henan Police College

基　　金：2015年最高人民检察院理论研究所重点课题"检察机关对行政执法活动的监督"(GJ2015B02);2016年度广东省地方立法研究高校联盟青年立法资助项目"广东省地方立法公众参与机制完善研究"

摘　　要：斡旋受贿是否独立成罪的立法论争未曾中断。介入"其他国家工作人员的职务行为"后,斡旋受贿与直接受贿、间接受贿不同,其本质是利用职权的"影响力"受贿。《反腐败公约》《刑法修正案(七)》《刑法修正案(九)》共同"倒逼"斡旋受贿独立成罪的立法进程,其罪名宜为"国家工作人员利用影响力受贿罪",应依法扩大犯罪对象,合理取舍"为谋取不正当利益"并配置法定刑。The debate over whether the behavior of mediating bribery should be an independent crime has never stopped yet. The behaviors of mediating bribery has been involved with the particular element of ＂the acts of national staff of the others＂, thus it is different from the provisions of direct bribery and indirect bribery. According to the legislative intent and judicial interpretation, the behavior of mediating bribery essentially reflects as the use of ＂power influence＂ to take bribery. As a result, the behavior of mediating bribery should be an independent crime according to Anti - Corruption Convention, Criminal Law Amendment Ⅶ and Criminal Law Amendment Ⅸ. Therefore, the crime should be set as ＂national staff using the influence to take bribes＂ and the object of this crime should be expanded legally. Meanwhile, the accurate and reasonable setting of the crime constitutions such as ＂to seek illegitimate interests＂ need to be considered so as to be matched with a reasonable punishment.

关 键 词：斡旋受贿 间接受贿 利用职权性影响力 立法建构 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]