检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:隋英杰[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学,北京100038
出 处:《湖南警察学院学报》2016年第5期88-94,共7页Journal of Hunan Police Academy
摘 要:监督与制约是公安机关刑事司法权的两种约束机制,二者不可混为一谈。监督机制在推动公安机关刑事司法权依法规范行使方面发挥了重要作用,但效果并不理想,相比之下,制约更具有明显的优势。在当前依法治国和以审判为中心的司法制度改革背景下,从监督论走向制约论,完善权力制约机制,才是公安机关刑事司法权有效约束的必然选择。Supervision and control is the public security organs of the criminal justice of the two mechanisms, which can not be confused. Supervision mechanism has played an important role in promoting the criminal judicial power of public security organs according to the law, but the effect is not ideal, in contrast,control has obvious advantages. Under the background of the current legal system and judicial system reform, it is the inevitable choice of the public security organs to improve the effective restraint of the criminal judicial power, from the supervision theory to the control theory and the perfection of the power control mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.154