检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东省济南市第三人民医院妇科,山东济南250132
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2016年第22期48-49,共2页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的评价宫腔镜下输卵管插管疏通术治疗输卵管堵塞的临床效果。方法选取我院收治的输卵管堵塞患者166例,随机分成观察组和对照组,观察组采取宫腔镜下输卵管插管疏通术治疗,对照组采取传统输卵管疏通术治疗,比较两组临床效果。结果观察组总疏通率93.98%,对照组总疏通率71.08%,观察组患者总疏通率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论宫腔镜下输卵管插管疏通术治疗输卵管堵塞的临床效果显著。Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of fallopian tube catheterization under hysteroscopy in the treatment of fallopian tube obstruction. Methods Selected our hospital patients with fallopian tube obstruction in 166 cases,were randomly divided into observation group and control group,the observation group adopted fallopian tube catheterization under hysteroscopy,the control group took the traditional fallopian tube dredging therapy. Clinical effects were compared between the two groups. Results The total dredging rate of observation group was 93.98%,the control group was 71.08%,the total dredging rate of observation group was higher than that of control group,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of tubal catheterization and dredging in the treatment of tubal blockage is significant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3