检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王有[1]
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院大连医院急诊科,辽宁大连116600
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2016年第22期180-181,共2页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的分析比较丙泊酚与异氟醚深麻醉下拔管在高血压患者中的应用。方法选取2016年1-7月来我院进行治疗的110位高血压患者,随机分为丙泊酚组和异氟醚组。比较两组拔管时、拔管后的心血管变化以及苏醒时间。结果拔管时,两组患者心血管变化差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);拔管后5分钟,丙泊酚组的心血管情况比异氟醚组稳定(P〈0.05);丙泊酚组苏醒时间快于异氟醚组(P〈0.05)。结论高血压患者在深麻醉下选用丙泊酚,疗效更好。Objective To compare and analyze the application of propofol and isoflurane under deep anesthesia extubation in patients with hypertension. Methods From January to July 2016 in our hospital, 110 cases of patients with hypertension were randomly divided into propofol group and isoflurane group. Two groups were compared to the cardiovascular changes and recovery time of the after extubation. Results Extubation in two groups of patients with cardiovascular changes(P〉0.05). 5 minutes after extubation,cardiovascular conditions in propofol group was more stable than isoflurane group(P〈0.05). The stable recovery time in propofol group was lower than that of isoflurane group(P〈0.05). Conclusion Patients with hypertension in deep anesthesia has better efficacy by using propofol.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200