检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马静[1] 马蕊[1] 朱秀芝[1] 曲建平[1] 时昆[1] 孟巍[1] 王生萍[1] 冷菲菲[1] 程化坤[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省医院康复科,黑龙江哈尔滨150036
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2016年第22期202-204,共3页China Health Standard Management
基 金:黑龙江省卫生计生委科研课题;编号(2014-162)
摘 要:目的分析湿性愈合与干性愈合理论在封闭气管切开感染创口临床护理中的效果。方法选择我院收治的需气管切开的患者70例,随机分为两组,各35例。对照组实施干性愈合护理干预,观察组实施湿性愈合护理干预。比较两组患者临床疗效、换药次数及切口恢复时间。结果观察组换药次数、切口恢复时间与对照组相比均有降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与干性愈合护理相比,湿性愈合护理用于封闭气管切开感染创口中的治疗效果更佳,能有效的提高患者的治疗有效率,减少换药次数,缩短切口恢复时间。Objective To analyze the effect on closed clinical nursing of trachea incision infection wound by Wet and Dry healing theory. Methods To divide 70 patients with tracheotomy into two groups. The control group adopted dry healing nursing intervention and the observation group adopted the wet healing nursing intervention. The clinical curative effect,the times of dressing change and the recovery time of incision were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group,the times of dressing change and the recovery time of the observation group were decreased. The difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with Dry healing nursing,the treatment effect of Wet healing nursing for closed tracheotomy is better.It can effectively improve the patient's treatment efficiency,reduce the times of dressing change,shorten the recovery time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.193.237