检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁杨 DING Yang(Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730000, Chin)
机构地区:[1]兰州财经大学,甘肃兰州730000
出 处:《资源开发与市场》2017年第1期74-79,99,共7页Resource Development & Market
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(编号:16YJAZH051);甘肃省科技支撑计划软科学专项项目(编号:1604ZCRA020);国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41171116);国家自然科学基金青年项目(编号:41401653)
摘 要:基于新古典经济学纯粹市场理论的环境付费机制,在当前全球知识经济体系下已暴露出明显不足。随着工业化水平的提高,对环境的关注已成为突出的政治问题,特别是一些发达国家的民众越来越对以环境破坏与物种减少为代价获取经济与技术的快速发展提出质疑。比较了发达国家与发展中国家环境服务付费实践的差异,选择肯尼亚等5个发展中国家典型PES项目实践案例,介绍、分析、总结了PES实践的经验与教训,结合我国生态补偿实践的现状和新时期生态补偿实践中出现的主要新问题,提出思考与建议。Based on pure market theory of neoclassical economics, environmental payment mechanism exposed clearly insufficient in the current global knowledge economy. With the increase of the level of industrialization, concern for the environment became a prominent political issue. In par- ticular, more and more people in some developed counties questioned on rapid economic and technology development at the cost of environment de- strnction and species reduction. After comparing the difference on payment for environmental services between the developed countries and developing countries, six typical cases of PES projects in Kenya, a developing country, were chosen to introduce, analyze and summarize the PES practical experi- ence and lessons. Combined with China's major ecological compensation practice situation and new problems arised in practice, some thoughts and suggestions were put forward.
关 键 词:环境服务付费 外部性 生态补偿新问题 流域 贫困
分 类 号:F062.2[经济管理—政治经济学] X320.22[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222