论未成年人监护的价值理念——以国家干预及其尺度为视角  

The Legislative Philosophy of Minor Guardianship——Based on the Perspective of the Boundary of State Intervention

作　　者：张善斌[1] 宁园 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期1200-1206,共7页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：近年来,未成年人保护的严峻形势直接暴露了我国未成年人监护制度的缺漏。宏观上,监护制度缺漏诸多,国家干预贫弱,呈现的是放任主义;微观上,针对性立法零散混乱,回避伦理亲情。宏观干预不足,微观矫枉过正的原因在于监护价值理念混乱模糊。随着未成年人利益本位的确立,家庭自治监护模式的式微,强化公权力干预获得正当性。但同时不能忽视监护关系的先在性和家庭监护的天然优势,对家庭监护的伦理性给予充分尊重,在干预过程中应当注重家庭监护的法律化和强制化,在引入未成年人最大利益原则的同时对最大利益作柔性考量。建立以家庭监护为主要模式,以国家监护为个别辅助模式的监护形态。The serious situations of protection of minors directly expose legal loopholes of minor guardianship system. On macro level, state intervention is weak, presenting as laissez-faire. On micro level, specific legislation scattered in chaos, violating ethic affection. What causes this irrationality is the confused value concept of minor guardianship system. With the decline of family autonomy, strengthening the state intervention gains legitimacy. State intervention has to give full respect of natural family ethics. In the process of intervention, introducing the principle of best interests of minors combined with flexible consideration. The family guardianship as the main mode and the state guardianship as the auxiliary mode combine to reasonable minor guardianship mode.

关 键 词：未成年人监护 国家干预 家庭自治 未成年人最大利益原则 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]