微注射成型与常规注射成型LLDPE的对比研究  

Comparison Study of LLDPE Parts Molded by Microinjection Molding and Conventional Injection Molding

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:石素宇[1] 王利娜[1] 燕世林 王怡丰[1] 郑国强[2] Shi Suyu Wang Lina Yan Shilin Wang Yifeng Zheng Guoqiang(College of Material and Chemical Engineering, Henan Institute of Engineering, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450007 School of Material Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001)

机构地区:[1]河南工程学院材料与化学工程学院,河南郑州450007 [2]郑州大学材料科学与工程学院,河南郑州450001

出  处:《现代塑料加工应用》2016年第6期1-4,共4页Modern Plastics Processing and Applications

基  金:国家自然科学基金(51173171)资助

摘  要:分别采用微注射成型和常规注射成型技术,制备了厚度为0.2 mm和1.5 mm的线性低密度聚乙烯(LLDPE)制品。通过拉伸性能测试、差示扫描量热法(DSC)和小角X射线散射(SAXS)试验对比,研究了制品的力学性能和微结构。拉伸测试结果表明:微注射成型LLDPE制品相对于传统注射成型LLDPE制品具有较低的拉伸强度和屈服强度,这与文献中报道的结果不一致。通过分析微结构的表征结果发现,微注射成型LLDPE制品具有较低强度的主要原因是LLDPE微制品形成了较多不完善的、片晶厚度较薄的晶体结构,且结晶度较低。LLDPE microparts with 0. 2 mm thickness and macroparts with 1. 5 mm thickness were prepared by using microinjection molding and conventional injection molding, respectively. Tensile test, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and small-angle X- ray scattering (SAXS) were performed to provide a comparison study of mechanical properties and microstructure. The tensile test indicates that LLDPE micropart exhibits lower tensile strength and yield strength compared to LLDPE macropart, which is contrary to the reported results in literatures. Based on thorough analysis of the microstructure results, the reason for unexpected lower tensile strength and yield strength of LLDPE microparts is explored. It is suggested that lower crystallinity, formation of imperfect crystals with thin lamellae and a wide distribution of lamellae thickness lead to the poor mechanical properties in LLDPE microparts.

关 键 词:微注射成型 微结构 线性低密度聚乙烯 力学性能 晶体结构 

分 类 号:TQ320.662[化学工程—合成树脂塑料工业]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象