检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张继德[1] 姜鹏[1] ZHANG Jide JIANG Peng(Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)
出 处:《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第6期83-91,共9页JOURNAL OF BEIJING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS UNIVERSITY:SOCIAL SCIENCES
基 金:北京市教育委员会社科计划重点项目"混合所有制;董事会治理结构和治理机制"(SZ20161001106);国家社会科学基金重大项目"国家治理视角下国有经营预算制度研究"(14ZDA027);国家社会科学基金重点项目"国有资本授权关系及实现模式研究"(14AJY005)
摘 要:近年来,我国上市公司高管薪酬尤其是国有企业高管薪酬成为政府监管的重点和社会舆论关注的焦点问题。文章以2010—2014年我国沪深两市A股上市公司为研究对象,实证检验了上市公司高管薪酬粘性的存在性;同时,重点考察了股权结构、产权性质对上市公司高管薪酬粘性的影响程度。实证结果显示:我国上市公司高管薪酬具有显著的粘性特征;在股权结构的影响方面,第一大股东持股比例越高,股权制衡度越低,高管薪酬粘性相应越高,当控股股东与中小股东之间产生利益冲突时,上市公司高管作为控股股东利益的代表,通常忽视上市公司高管薪酬与企业业绩的不对称性,因此薪酬粘性成为控股股东对高管的奖励;在产权性质的影响方面,国有企业高管薪酬粘性显著大于非国有企业。研究结论对于提高我国上市公司的治理效率、降低代理成本、优化激励机制设计具有一定的启示。In recent years, the executive compensation in China's listed companies, especially in the state-owned enterprises(SOEs) , has been an emphasis for government regulation and a focus with social concern. Based on the research object of the A-share listed companies on Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange in China during the years from 2010 to 2014,this paper empirically verifies the existence of executive compensation stickiness in the listed companies. At the same time, itemphasizes the study on how ownership structure and property right nature affect the executive compensation stickiness in the lis-ted companies. The result shows that the executive compensation in China's listed companies has the obvious characteristics ofstickiness. As to the influence of ownership structure, the higher the proportion of the largest shareholder is, the lower the equitybalance degree, and the higher the executive compensation stickiness. When the controlling shareholder and minority shareholde-rs have a conflict of interest, executives usually represent the interests of the controlling shareholder and often neglect the asym-metry between executive compensation and corporate performance, and hence the compensation stickiness becomes an award toexecutives by controlling shareholder. As to the influence of property right nature, the executive compensation stickiness is obvi-ously greater in the SOEs than in the non-state enterprises. The research conclusions are enlightening in improving the governanceefficiency in China's listed companies, reducing the agency cost, and optimizing the incentives mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222