现代性视域下的商品化都市景观及其批判——从齐美尔到法兰克福学派  

The Commercialized Townscape and Its Criticism in the Perspective of Modernity——from Simmel to Frankfurt School

作　　者：杨向荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江传媒学院,浙江桐乡314500

出　　处：《广东开放大学学报》2016年第6期55-61,共7页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"齐美尔与法兰克福学派文艺理论的关联研究"(10CZW007)阶段性成果

摘　　要：齐美尔对商品特征,劳动分工给个体所带来的伤害,以及展览会上的商品给个体带来的短暂休憩展开了批判。沿着齐美尔的足迹,法兰克福学派批判了文化工业对个体所造成的伤害,并对商品拜物教、消费物质化、符号化的幻象等现象展开了批判性反思。法兰克福学派与齐美尔的现代性都市批判理论有很多相似之处,可以说是对齐美尔现代性都市批判理论的沿续与发展。Simmel criticized the product feature, the harm that the division of labor causes to individuals, and the short break to the individuals caused by the commodity on the exhibition. Following his thoughts, the Frankfurt School criticized the harm of cultural industry to the individuals. Meanwhile, the school conducted critical retrospection on the phenomena of commodity fetishism, material consumption, and symbolic illusion. There are many similarities between the Frankfurt School and Simmel＇s modem metropolitan critical theory, and in many ways the former inherits and develops the latter＇s modem metropolis criticism.

关 键 词：现代性 商品化 都市景观 批判 

分 类 号：I106.4[文学—世界文学]