间隙和持续蓝光照射治疗新生儿黄疸效果观察  

Efficacy of intermittent and continuous blue light irradiation on newborn jaundice

作　　者：梁洁芳[1] 曾碧仪 饶晓林 苏光辉[1] 麦静仪[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省广州市第十二人民医院儿科,广州510620

出　　处：《临床医学》2016年第12期49-50,共2页Clinical Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨持续与间隙蓝光照射治疗新生儿黄疸的临床效果。方法选取2015年3月至12月儿科爱婴区新生儿黄疸患儿120例,随机分为两组,每组60例。在常规治疗的基础上,对照组采用持续蓝光照射,观察组则采用间隙蓝光照射,比较两组临床疗效及不良反应。结果观察组总有效率为96.67%(58/60),对照组为93.33%(56/60),两组比较差异未见统计学意义(χ2=0.70,P>0.05);观察组不良反应发生率为13.33%(8/60),对照组为28.33%(17/60),两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.09,P<0.05)。结论持续与间隙蓝光照射治疗新生儿黄疸均有较佳临床效果,但间隙蓝光照射更加安全,值得临床推广应用。Objective To investigate the effect of intermittent and continuous blue light irradiation on newborn jaundice. Methods From March 2015 to December 2015,120 children with neonatal jaundice in pediatric clinic were selected,and randomly divided into the two groups,with 60 cases in each group. On the basis of conventional therapy,the control group was given continuous blue light,while the observation group was treated with intermittent blue light,the clinical curative effect and adverse reaction in the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate in the observation group was 96. 67%（58 / 60）,which was 93. 33%（56 / 60）in the control group,the difference was not significant between the two groups（χ2 =0. 70,P 〉 0. 05）. The adverse reactions in the observation group was 13. 33%（8 / 60）,while which was 28. 33% in the control group（17 / 60）,the difference was significant between the two groups（χ2 = 4. 09,P 〈 0. 05）. Conclusion Intermittent and continuous blue light irradiation on newborn jaundice all have better clinical effect,the intermittent blue light irradiation is safer, and is worth application.

关 键 词：间隙蓝光 持续蓝光 新生儿黄疸 

分 类 号：R722.17[医药卫生—儿科]