历史不可验证说的语义结构与内在逻辑  

The Semantic Structure and Internal Logic of the Theory of “History Cannot Be Verified”

作　　者：卓立[1] ZHUO Li(School of Marxism, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学马克思主义学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2016年第6期13-20,共8页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：重庆市社会科学规划2014年度培育项目"中国现代实证史学知识论基础重建研究"(2014PY31)

摘　　要：历史不可验证说看起来是不证自明的,以致学术界对此一直缺乏反思和辨析。正是从历史不可验证说出发,历史相对主义得以展开理论论证。然而实际上,历史不可验证说是一种语义含混的笼统说法,而其结论,也远非自明的。历史不可验证说在"验证"一词的语义上由于中西语言的差异,而一直有所混淆,同时在概念上也存在模糊之处,这亦是导致历史不可验证说的重要原因。实际上,历史不可验证说最终的理论依据是当下直接确定性,而以当下直接确定性为最终依据,指向的并不只是对历史学知识的否定,而是对全部实存时间中经验陈述的否定,这又恰与这一经验主义原则的本旨是相违背的。It seems that the theory of ＂history cannot be verified＂ is self-evident, and consequently the academic circles seldom reflect upon or probe into it. Historical relativism is based on this theory. However, this theory is ambiguous and its conclusion is far from being self-evident. ＂ Verification＂ has different connotation this theory. hence this in existing in Chinese and English, therefore its connotation is obscure too, which triggered the emergence of In fact, the most essential theoretical foundation of this theory is ＂instantly direct definiteness＂, theoretical foundation does not directed to a denial of historical knowledge, but of personal statement time, which is exactly opposite to the real intention of the historical experientialism.

关 键 词：历史相对主义 证实 验证 过去 确定性 

分 类 号：B01[哲学宗教—哲学理论]