检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王炳淇 韩小渠 张程[1] 周延[1] 严俊杰[1]
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学动力工程多相流国家重点实验室,西安710049
出 处:《工程热物理学报》2017年第1期27-32,共6页Journal of Engineering Thermophysics
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(No.2015CB251504);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51436006;No.U1261210)
摘 要:本文利用GSE软件建立了600 MW超临界褐煤锅炉蒸汽温度模糊PID控制系统的仿真模型,进行了模糊PID控制效果的仿真研究,并与常规PID控制进行了对比。研究结果发现,在抽炉烟份额从100%降至50%的扰动下,模糊控制方案的主汽温的最小值比常规控制高0.21℃,最大值低0.15℃,动态时间缩短了477 s;再热汽温的最小值比常规控制高0.32℃,最大值低0.49℃,动态时间缩短了387 s。模糊控制下的汽温调节的快速性和稳定性均优于常规控制,证明了该模糊控制方案能够改善控制系统的控制质量。仿真实验的结果对电厂汽温控制系统的优化具有一定的参考意义。In this paper,a Fuzzy-PID model was established for a 600 MW supercritical lignite-fired boiler through GSE software,of which the control effect was tested and compared with conventional PID control.The research result showed that when hot flue gas extracting percent stepped from100%to 50%,the minimum of live steam temperature of Fuzzy-PID strategy was higher by 0.21℃than conventional PID strategy,while the maximum of which was lower by 0.15℃,and the time of dynamic response reduced by 477 s;Under the same condition,the minimum of reheat outlet steam temperature of Fuzzy-PID strategy was higher by 0.32℃ than conventional PID strategy,while the maximum of which was lower by 0.49℃,and the time of dynamic response reduced by 387 s.It turned out that rapidity and stability of steam temperature adjustment under Fuzzy-PID control was better than conventional PID control,proving that this Fuzzy-PID strategy could improve the quality of common-used control system.The consequence had certain significance on power plant steam temperature control system optimization.
分 类 号:TK323[动力工程及工程热物理—热能工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185