检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院
出 处:《国际贸易问题》2017年第1期127-138,共12页Journal of International Trade
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目"基础设施驱动经济空间集聚的理论机制;经验证据及政策方案优化研究"(71503042);北京市社会科学基金青年项目"北京市农村基础设施需求与统筹城乡配置研究"(14JGC106)
摘 要:外商直接投资(FDI)作为私人部门引进技术的重要载体,其进入公共事业领域是否会对城市基础设施改进存在着技术溢出效应?文章基于2007-2012年我国645个县区级城市层面的面板数据,构建静态及动态面板数据模型对上述问题进行了系统探究。研究结果表明:从总体上讲,FDI进入城市基础设施领域会通过技术溢出显著地提升城市基础设施绩效水平;不同类别城市基础设施领域的FDI进入的技术溢出效应存在着一定的差异性,即沿海地区城市低于内陆地区城市、东部地区城市低于西部地区城市以及市辖区低于县级市。这些结论可为我国未来调整公共事业领域吸引外资的政策提供重要的依据。Foreign direct investment (FDI) as an important carrier of the private sector to introduce technology, whether its participation in the public sector has caused technical spillover effects on the improvement of urban infrastructure? In the article, based on the data of 645 cities (county-level cities and municipal districts) from 2007 to 2012, we construct an empirical model of static and dynamic panel to study these issues systematically. The results show that: on the whole, FDI which participated in the public sector, had significantly improved the performance level of urban infrastructure through technology spillovers effect; and effect varied in different categories of urban infrastructure, i.e. coastal cities were less significant than the inland city, the eastern area cities were less significant than the westarea cities and municipal districts less than the county-level cities. These conclusions could provide an important basis for the future adjustment of policyin public sectors on attracting foreign investment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166