钓鱼岛记载始出文献之研究综述  

The Research Overview of Primary Ancient Archival and Cartographical Maritime Research Data of Diaoyu Islands

作　　者：陈小法[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地浙江工商大学东亚研究院

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2016年第12期121-126,159,共6页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社科规划项目"明清时期的钓鱼岛文献资料研究"(11YJA870003);国家社科基金项目"琉球的历史归属与钓鱼岛问题研究"(13BGJ011)系列成果之一

摘　　要：对最早记载钓鱼岛文献的研究结果,目前主要有"《山海经》说"、"《隋书》说"、"宋元针本说"、"《顺风相送》说"及"《三十六姓所传针本》说"等几种。其中,"《山海经》说"和"《隋书》说"争议较大,缺乏力证。"宋元针本说"虽合乎逻辑,但尚需物证来确认。"《顺风相送》说"是目前最大的共识,尤其是得到了官方认可之后,几乎成为定说,但因其成书年代扑朔,因而尚存商榷余地。而"《三十六姓所传针本》说"因原书散佚,看似可信度高,但有待实物来补正。The hallmarks of parlance about the ancient archival and cartographical surveying materials on primary maritime research of Diaoyu Dao, broadly speaking, include Shan Hai Jing parlance（ 山 海经Classic of Mountains and Seas）, Sui Shu parlance（ 隋 书 The Book of Sui）, records in Song and Yuan Dynasty parlance（ Song Yuan Zhen Ben Shuo 宋元针本说）, Shun Feng Xiang Song（顺风相送 Voyage with a Tailwind） and Sun Shi Liu Xing Suo Chuan Zhen Ben parlance（ 三十六姓所传针本）. Without concrete evidence, Shan Hai Jing parlance and Sui Shu parlance are subject to arguments. Song Yuan Zhen Ben Shuois logical and reasonable but in need of material evidence for corroboration.Consensus among scholars is Shun Feng Xiang Song parlance, which is officially supported by the government. Nevertheless, there is room for debate because of the exact time of anfractuous completion. It is a pity that the original copy of Liu Xing Suo Chuan Zhen Ben has been scattered and lost. Liu Xing Suo Chuan Zhen Ben parlance looks trustworthy and reliable but needs supportive corroborative evidence.

关 键 词：钓鱼岛文献 列姑射 高华屿 顺风相送 三十六姓所传针本 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]