检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜小文[1,2] 陶爱群[2] 曾继吾[1] 姜波[1] 钟云[1] 易干军[1] JIANG Xiaowen TAO Aiqun ZENG Jiwu JIANG Bo ZHONG Yun YI Ganjun(Institute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of South Subtropical Fruit Biology and Genetic Resource Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China Department of Landscape, Hunan Envionment-Biological Polytechnic, Hengyang, Hunan 421005, China)
机构地区:[1]广东省农业科学院果树研究所农业部南亚热带果树生物学与遗传资源利用重点实验室,广东广州510640 [2]湖南环境生物职业技术学院,湖南衡阳421005
出 处:《热带作物学报》2016年第12期2427-2433,共7页Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops
基 金:国家现代农业(柑橘)产业技术体系专项资金项目(No.CARS-27);国家科技支撑计划项目(No.2013BAD92B02);广东省科技计划项目(No.2015B090906026)
摘 要:为弄清年橘留树保鲜期间不同组织对氮素营养的吸收和分配情况,将稳定同位素^(15)N-尿素涂抹在5年生枳砧年橘叶片和果实后,分6个时期(6~480 h)取样分析果实和树体中不同部位^(15)N元素的含量。结果表明:年橘留树保鲜期间留果枝条对氮素的转运和分配与采果枝存在差异,涂抹^(15)N后丰度下降速率不同,留果树的无果枝平均下降速度达12.64%,采果后的枝条仅4.69%,留果树的有果枝居中,说明留树保鲜树体新梢是第一氮营养分配中心,果实是第二氮营养分配中心;没有留树保鲜的采果枝条,新梢是主要的氮营养分配中心。涂抹在叶片上的氮素可转运到果实,涂抹在果皮上的氮素经果实吸收后也可转运到叶片。叶片吸收的氮转运到新梢的含量显著高于转运到留树果实的氮含量,表明留树保鲜期内没有改变树体氮素的分配模式,从营养角度解释年橘留树保鲜不影响第二年产量的原因,为年橘留树保鲜期间合理施肥提供科学依据。To give insight into the uptake and distribution of nitrogen in Nianju( Citrus reticuiata Blanco) during fruits on tree storage, the leaves and fruits of 5-years old Nianju/Poncirus trifoliate were scribbled with stable isotope^15N-labelled urea and the contents of^15N from fruits and other parts of tree were detected at 6 different phases after treatment. The results indicated that different types of shoots had different characteristics of nitrogen translocation and distribution during refreshment on trees. The Ndff(^15N derived from fertilizer) of the middle leaves scribbled15 N dropped in different rate. The average decline rate of^15N abundance in the bearing shoots with refreshment on trees was higher than the harvested bearing shoots(with the ratio of 4.69%), but lower than vegetative shoots(12.64%) after treated with ^15N-urea, suggesting that new shoots rather than fruits were the first distribution center of nitrogen. The absorbed ^15N in the leaves could be transferred to the fruits and vice versa.However, the content of15 N transferred from leaves to new shoots was significantly higher than that transferred from leaves to fruits, indicating that the inherent nitrogen distribution pattern did not change during refreshment on trees. Taken together, the results obtained above offer a rational explanation for why appropriate refreshment on trees do not influence the yield of next year from nutritional point and provide a scientific basis for reasonable fertilization during refreshment on trees in Nianju.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.124.172