苏炳添100m运动技术分析与诊断——以2015世界田径锦标赛为例  

The Analysis of Main Gaps on 100m between Su Bing- tian and Bolt Technology Comparatives—Taking the World Track and Field Championships as the Case

作　　者：易文娟[1] 詹晓梅[1] 谢佩玲[1] 梁强[1] YI Wen - juan ZHAN Xiao - mei XIE Pei - ling LIANG Qiang(Physical Education Institution of Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022 , Chin)

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学体育学院,江西南昌330022

出　　处：《福建体育科技》2016年第6期41-43,共3页Fujian Sports Science and Technology

摘　　要：为我国男子百米运动技术水平的发展提供理论参考,运用信息技术为主的研究方法,对2015年北京世锦赛上男子100m半决赛中苏炳添与博尔特的百米技术参数进行研究。结果表明,苏炳添步频能力超强,但步长能力仍与博尔特存在一定差距。单步中,前支撑阶段工作距离短是苏炳添与博尔特的主要技术差距。支撑腿与摆动腿的大幅度后蹬高摆动作是博尔特支撑与摆动技术的突出特征;苏炳添支撑腿工作幅度小、支撑摆动技术不完善使得后蹬力量与身体的向前动力不足。博尔特100m全程步频慢,最高步频保持阶段多,节奏平稳;而苏炳添虽步频快,但最高步频保持阶段少、全程步频起伏大。Provided the theoretical reference for improving the dash sports technical level. Using the methods of information technology to study the technical parameters of Su Bing - tian and the Bolt in the World Track and Field Championships in 2015. This paper points out that Su Bing - tian who owned strong stride frequency ability, but the step length ability was still has a gap with Bolt. In a single step, the front support phase working distance for Su Bing - tian was shorter than Bolt at the same phase. In the midway running, the features of Bolt＇ s supporting and swinging leg were work on a large scale ; on the contrary, Su Bing - tian ＇ s entire supporting leg and swinging leg working range were not enough so led to lack of driving strength and forward motivation. Bolt was in slow stride frequency, but the highest stride frequency maintenance was strong and the rhythm in 100m running was stable. While Su Bing - tian was always in a high stride frequency in the full distance, but the highest stride frequency was maintain less and the entire frequency ups and downs.

关 键 词：苏炳添 博尔特 100m 技术特征 

分 类 号：G822.1[文化科学—体育训练]