论国际刑法中“一事不再理”原则的适用  

On Application of “Ne Bis in Idem” in International Criminal Law

作　　者：杨淼鑫[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《南京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第4期56-60,共5页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics（Social Sciences）

摘　　要："一事不再理"是国际刑事司法协助的基本准则,在人权保障观念的影响下,"一事不再理"原则的重要性日益凸显。应将"一事不再理"原则中的"一事"界定为"同一事实或同一行为",严格区分国际刑法与国内法中的"一事不再理"原则。在起诉前和诉讼中阶段可以适用"一事不再理"原则;作出最终的判决或决定阶段,绝对适用"一事不再理"原则;第三国或引渡请求国已经就被请求引渡人的犯罪行为作出终局裁决的,被请求国仍能以"一事不再理"原则为由拒绝引渡请求。我国《刑法》第10条和《刑事诉讼法》的规定与"一事不再理"原则相矛盾,应通过相关条款的完善实现国际条约与国内立法的衔接,切实保障被告人的基本权利。＂Ne bis in idem＂ is a basic principle in international criminal i udicial assistance. With the rising concept of human rights protection, ＂Ne bis in idem＂ principle gradually plays a pivotal role in the interna- tional community. ＂Issue＂ of ＂Ne his in idem＂ principle can be defined as ＂the same facts or the same be- havior＂ . ＂Ne bis in idem＂ principle in international criminal law and domestic law should be distinguish- ed. ＂Ne bis in idem＂ principle can be applied to the stage of prosecution and proceedings and the stage of making a final judgment or decision. Furthmore, when the third country or the request for extradition countries has made a final decision for the crime of the extradition persons, the requested country can re- fuse extradition request based on the principle of ＂Ne bis in idem＂ . However, Article 10 of China＇s Crimi- nal Law and provisions of China＇s Code of Criminal Procedure contradict with ＂Ne bis in idem＂ principle. Consequently, in order to protect the basic rights of the accused effectively, we should coordinate interna- tional treaties and domestic legislation through the improvement of relevant provisions.

关 键 词：一事不再理 一事 适用范围 国际刑法 

分 类 号：D997.9[政治法律—刑法学]