政府绩效立法的央地互动模式:美国的经验与启示  

An Interactive Model of “Local-central” Government Performance Legislation:American Experience and Enlightenment

作　　者：尚虎平[1] 韩清颖 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学政治与公共管理学院/江苏省新型城镇化与社会治理协同创新中心,江苏苏州215000 [2]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津300350

出　　处：《甘肃行政学院学报》2016年第5期4-12,共9页Journal of Gansu Administration Institute

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目(编号:14BGL115);教育部人文社科规划项目(编号:13YJAZH076);中国博士后特别资助项目(编号:2014T70107);中国博士后一等资助项目(编号:2013M530058);国家自然科学基金重点项目(编号:71433005);中央高校基金项目(编号:15LZUJBWZY112)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：改革开放至今,中国政府绩效管理"面子工程"问题突出,缺乏法律的保障和指导。美国作为政府绩效评估的领跑者,政府绩效立法不仅在发展历程上有着明显的地方分散先行探索、中央吸收经验跟进的轨迹,就是立法目标、内容上也秉承了这种逻辑。通过对美国33个有立法资料支撑的州的政府绩效立法的分析,我们发现美国的联邦中央政府绩效立法与地方政府立法在内容上具有某种同趋性变化。对我国而言,要建立政府绩效管理的长效机制,必须要明确法制化、鼓励各地"地方先行"、出台全国性的法律法规和对立法进行及时修订和升级。Since the reform and opening up, the government performance management in China has the outstanding 'Face project' issue, lacking of legal protection and guidance. Whereas in the leading American government performance evaluation, legislation in the course of development follow up a 'local governments explore decentralized and advanced, the central absorb and keep abreast' path, but also in the legislative goal and content side. Through the analysis of the 33 state government performance legislation in the United States, we found that federal government and local government performance legislation has a common trend in the content. For us, it is necessary to establish a long-term mechanism of government performance management, including establish a legal system, encourage'Local first', come up with national law sand timely revise and upgrade the legislation.

关 键 词：绩效评估 政府绩效立法 地方先行 央地互动 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]