关于苗蛮图研究的一点商榷与一个建议  

A Discussion of the Study about“Miaomantu”and a Suggestion

作　　者：张琏[1] 

机构地区：[1]台湾东华大学历史系,台湾新北23153

出　　处：《遵义师范学院学报》2016年第6期17-21,共5页Journal of Zunyi Normal University

摘　　要：自20世纪迄今,苗蛮图研究已逐渐在民族学中占有一席之地。2001年,国内出版了李汉林《百苗图校释》,所下功夫,令人敬佩。所谓"百苗图"是指自清陈浩《八十二种苗图并说》及其后一系列抄本的总称。然而有评议认为,陈浩《八十二种苗图并说》有"丰富的资料和精美的绘图",且认为《百苗图校释》已"大致恢复陈浩原作部分文字原貌"。这种看法是不准确的,是对史料的误读。另外,不应用"百苗图",因为这是一个不严谨的统称,更不应写作《百苗图》,因为它更不是一个书名。Since 20th century, the study of Miaomantu has gradually occupied a position in the ethnology. The Annotation of Baimiaotu in 2001 by Li Han-lin is admirable due to Li Han-lin＇s great endeavors. ＂Baimiaotu＂ refers to the general name for ＂Eighty-two kinds of Miao Maps＂ by Chen Hao in Qing Dynasty and its later series of copies. However, some commentators remarked that ＂the map by Chen Hao is possessed of rich information and graphical drawings＂, and that The Annotation of Baimiaotu ＂has recovered some original words or expressions of Chen＇s work＂, and this remark is not right, just a kind of misreading of literature. In addition, ＂Baimiaotu＂ should not be used because it is not a rigorous name, and even the book title should not use ＂Baimiaotu＂ for it is not a name fit for a book.

关 键 词：苗蛮图 百苗图校释 八十二种苗图并说 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学]