检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《控制与决策》2017年第1期117-123,共7页Control and Decision
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71301036;71171069)
摘 要:将公平关切性引入到零售商主导的闭环供应链中,分别在零售商公平中性和公平关切下,分析闭环供应链成员及整体的最优决策问题,并对两种情形下的均衡结果进行比较.研究表明,主导零售商的公平关切性对其自身效用的最大化是有利的,对制造商和第三方利润的最大化是不利的.零售商公平关切程度相对较弱时,其公平关切程度的增强对闭环供应链系统是不利的,反之,其公平关切程度的增强对闭环供应链系统是有利的.The fairness concern is introduced into a closed-loop supply chain system with a dominant retailer. Under the case that considering and without considering the dominant retailer's fairness concern, the optimal decisions of members as well as the whole closed-loop supply chain system are analyzed respectively, and the equilibrium results are compared. The results show that the dominant retailer's fairness concern is beneficial to the maximization of his own utility, but unfavorable to the profit maximization of the manufacturer and the third party recycler. The increase of dominant retailer's fairness concern is unfavorable to the utility of the whole closed-loop supply chain system when the fairness concern is relatively weak, but it will be beneficial on the contrary.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.21.235