检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学机械与能源工程学院,上海201804
出 处:《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》2016年第12期1962-1968,共7页Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基 金:上海市博士后基金(11R21416500)
摘 要:为了有效解决异质品双渠道供应链的定价问题,研究了产品差异性对定价策略的影响.基于消费者剩余理论,构建了异质品双渠道供应链的定价决策模型.在此基础上,运用Stackelberg博弈求得异质品双渠道中零售商和制造商的最优定价以及零售商和制造商的最佳收益,并通过数值试验分析产品差异性对双渠道供应链各方以及整体定价策略和利润的影响.结果显示,采取高端产品的差异化战略对零售商、制造商以及供应链整体都有利.To effectively solve the problem of pricing strategies in dual-channel supply chain with heterogeneous product, the effect of product dissimilitude on pricing strategies was researched. Firstly, a pricing decision model of dual-channel heterogeneous product supply chain was built based on consumer surplus theory. Then Stackelberg game was applied to get the optimal pricing and profits of manufacture and retailer. Finally, the effect of product dissimilitude on pricing strategies and profits of manufacture, retailer and the whole supply chain was analyzed by numerical experiment. The results indicate that strategy of high-end product dissimilitude is benefit for manufacture, retailer and the whole supply chain.
关 键 词:供应链 双渠道 异质品 定价 STACKELBERG博弈
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.193.179