从《民法总则(草案)》看民法典条文形式性编纂技术--部分基于法律条文大数据分析对比技术的编纂建议  

Discovering Techniques for Formatively Compiling Articles of Civil Code from the General Provision of Civil Law( Draft) --Suggestions on Compiling Partly Based on Big Data Comparing and Analyzing Techniques on Law

作　　者：王竹[1] WANG Zhu(Law School, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610064, China)

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207

出　　处：《法学论坛》2017年第1期20-27,共8页Legal Forum

基　　金：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"民法典编纂疑难问题法律大数据分析研究"(16SFB3032)的部分成果

摘　　要：民法典的编纂技术体系分为微观条文编纂技术和宏观体系编纂技术,微观条文编纂技术应该区分条文形式性编纂技术和条文实质性编纂技术。条文形式性编纂技术主要包括直接汇编和形式意义修改两类。以民事法律为主要形式编纂对象,以相关司法解释为辅助形式编纂对象,二者适用不同的具体编纂技术。利用法律条文大数据分析对比技术,可以"举一反三"地统一对结构类似的条文适用相同的条文形式性编纂技术。条文形式性编纂技术在民法典编纂过程中具有限制性适用要求,同时应该借助法律条文大数据分析对比技术避免形式性遗漏。Techniques for compiling Civil Code can be divided into micro techniques on compiling articles and macro systematic compiling techniques. The micro techniques on compiling articles can be further divided into formative and substantial techniques on compiling articles. Techniques for formative compiling articles include direct assemblies and formative changes. Different tech- niques are applied in compiling civil laws and judicial interpretations, the former as the main object of compiling and latter the supporting object. Making use of the big data comparing and analyzing techniques on law, it is found that the same techniques can be applied to formatively compiling the articles with the similar structures. It is requested that the techniques for formatively com- piling articles are limited in application in compiling the Civil Code, and big data comparing and analyzing techniques on law should be introduced to avoid formative negligence.

关 键 词：民法典 《民法总则(草案)》 条文编纂技术 形式性 限制性 

分 类 号：D913.1[政治法律—民商法学]