南极治理机制的类型分析  

An Analysis of Types of Antarctic Governance Regime

作　　者：王婉潞[1] WANG Wanlu(Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学,上海200433

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2016年第12期77-86,共10页Pacific Journal

基　　金：国家海洋局"南北极环境综合考察与评估"2016年子课题"南极地缘政治新变化与国别研究"(CHINARE2016-04-05-01-03);国家领土主权与海洋权益协同创新中心;复旦大学中国与周边国家关系研究中心出国资助

摘　　要：南极治理中同时存在不同类型的治理机制。研究各领域的治理机制是理解南极治理的基础,且能为解决南极问题提供新思路。根据南极条约协商国是否主导机制的产生与运行,南极治理机制可以分为标准型、独立型、自我规制型。领土主权、科学合作与信息交流、环境保护的治理机制属于标准型;生物资源、矿产资源的治理机制属于独立型;南极旅游治理机制属于自我规制型。在明晰南极治理机制的基础上,我国可以在具体领域制定相应的政策来完善南极治理。There are different types of regimes in Antarctic governance. The study of governance regimes in various fields is essential to understand the Antarctic governance, providing new perspective to the solution of Antarctic problem. According to the role which Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties plays in the regime design and operation, there are three types of governance, Standard, Independent, and Self-Regulation type. Governance regime of territorial sovereignty, scientific cooperation, information communication, and environmental protection belongs to the Standard type; biological resources and mineral resources belong to the Independent type; the Antarctic tourism belongs to the Self-Regulation type. Based on the classification of the Antarctic governance regime, China can make corresponding policies in specific field to perfect the Antarctic governance.

关 键 词：南极治理 治理机制 南极条约体系 南极条约协商国 南极条约协商会议 

分 类 号：D815[政治法律—国际关系]