政治学囚笼中的国际关系学  

International Relations in the Prison of Political Science

作　　者：贾斯廷.罗森博格 宋鸥[2] Justin Rosenberg(Department of International Relations, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN19RH, UK)

机构地区：[1]萨塞克斯大学国际关系学系 [2]吉林大学<史学集刊>编辑部

出　　处：《史学集刊》2017年第1期4-21,共18页Collected Papers of History Studies

摘　　要：最近几十年来,国际关系学科经历了机构的急剧增长和前所未有的知识拓展。然而,与地理学、社会学、历史学和比较文学这些邻近的学科不同,它仍然没有生成能够影响整个人文科学的"大思想"。为何会出现这一情形?对此有何应对之策?本文分三个方面予以阐释:首先,回溯了国际关系学作为政治学分支的持久性界定问题;其次,指出应依据自身学科相互关联的问题群——即(社会)多样性的重要性来重新确定国际关系学的基础;最后表明重新确定国际关系学基础如何开启了它的跨学科潜力。具体而言,"不平衡与综合发展"提供了国际关系学的"大思想"可以传播到其他学科的一个范例,因为通过把多样性的意义付诸实践,它揭示了"国际"对于作为一个整体的社会世界的因果意义和构成意义。In recent decades, the discipline of International Relations （IR） has experienced both dramatic institutional growth and unprecedented intellectual enrichment. And yet, unlike neighbouring disciplines such as Geography, Sociology, History and Comparative Literature, it has still not generated any ＂big ideas＂ that have impacted across the human sciences. Why is this？ And what can be done about it？ This article provides an answer in three steps. First, it traces the problem to IR＇s enduring definition as a subfield of Political Sci- ence. Second, it argues that IR should be regrounded in its own disciplinary problematique： the conse- quences of （societal） multiplicity. And finally, it shows how this re - grounding unlocks the transdisciplinary potential of IR. Specifically, ＂uneven and combined development＂ provides an example of an IR ＂big idea＂ that could travel to other disciplines： for by operationalizing the consequences of multiplicity, it reveals the causal and constitutive significance of ＂the international＂ for the social world as a whole.

关 键 词：历史社会学 国际关系学 国际理论 政治学 不平衡与综合发展 

分 类 号：D81[政治法律—国际关系]