检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨先雷 丰贵文[1] 杨万雷[2] 尚文俊[1] 庞新路[1] 李金锋[1]
机构地区:[1]郑州大学第一附属医院肾移植科,450052 [2]郑州大学基础医学院,450001
出 处:《实用医学杂志》2017年第1期18-21,共4页The Journal of Practical Medicine
基 金:郑州大学第一附属医院青年基金(编号:2011-QN010);郑州大学大学生创新训练项目(编号:2015xjxm291)
摘 要:目的:研究夫妻肾移植所具有的临床效果,分析亲属活体肾移植的现状及其影响因素和家庭、社会意义。方法:回顾性收集郑州大学第一附属医院肾移植科自2011年1月至2013年12月所有夫妻肾移植病例资料,排除供肾影响因素,选取同期供肾为女性、供受者年龄接近的具有血缘关系的亲属活体肾移植兄弟姐妹组,收集两组受者术后恢复情况,统计学方法对比两组肾功能恢复有无差异。结合当今社会现状,在供肾尤其短缺的情况下,分析夫妻活体肾移植所具有的临床、社会及家庭意义。结果:夫妻组12例、兄弟姐妹组8例,供受者年龄相差分别为(0.33±0.98)岁、(2.29±7.23)岁,人主要组织相容性抗原配合:夫妻组配合均小于3个,兄弟姐妹组均大于或等于3个。两组受者血肌酐、尿素氮下降趋势差异均无统计学意义(P=0.84、P=0.79)。结论:夫妻供肾在供肾质量、器官来源上具有明显的优势,而且具有较好的临床疗效和较大的社会、家庭意义。Objective To investigate the status of living relative kidney transplantation, and the clinical effects and social significances of kidney transplantation between spouses. Methods We retrospectively collected the clinical data of the department of kidney transplant of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, from January 2011 to December 2013. The spouse group as group 1, the age and sex of doners were taken into account, the siblings with the similar age of the same period were enrolled in group 2. Then the postoperative recoveries of the two groups were compared. Considering the current social status, particularly the shortage of donor kidneys, the clinical, social and family significances of kidney transplantation between spouses were analyzed. Results Twelve cases of spouses in group 1, 8 cases of siblings in group 2, the differences of donor and recipient age of the two groups were 0.33 ± 0.98 years and 2.29 ± 7.23 years, respectively. The human major histocompatibility complex antigens (HLA) was less than three in group 1, and was greater than or equal to three in group 2. The changes of serum creatinine and urea nitrogen were analyzed. No significant differences of serum creatinine and downward trend of blood urea nitrogen were observed between two groups (P = 0.84, P = 0.79). Conclusion The kidney transplantation between spouses has good clinical efficacy and great social significance, improving the status of the shortage of donor kidney and contributing to family harmony. The renal transplantation between spouses has obvious advantages and need further promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.168.253