《合同法》第402条、第403条在仲裁中的适用  

作　　者：王坚[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院

出　　处：《北京仲裁》2016年第4期124-141,共18页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly

摘　　要：我国《合同法》第402条、第403条规定的隐名代理与间接代理制度在学理上存在较大争议，司法实践中运用难度较大，在特定类型的案件中无法区分代理的类型，而随着国际商事贸易的发展，代理商在国际贸易中发挥越来越大的作用，第402条、第403条的问题实质上是“仲裁条款效力范围”和“仲裁条款能否自动转让”的问题，现有的学说和案例已经为解决问题提供了思路。China＇s Contract Law article 402 and 403 stipulate the undisclosed agency and indirect agency, which are of considerate contro- versy in the doctrinal. It also bring difficulties in judicial practice because justice can＇t distinguish between types of agency in certain types of ceses. With the development of international commercial trade, agents play an increasingly important role. Difficulties of the article 402 and 403 are essentially ＂force range of arbitration clause＂ and ＂whether the arbitration clauses can automatically transfer. Existing doctrine and the cases have provided ideas to solve the problem.

关 键 词：第402条 第403条 隐名代理 间接代理 仲裁协议 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]