检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:温长庆
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学法学院
出 处:《北京仲裁》2016年第4期233-247,共15页Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
摘 要:仲裁条款的独立性的认识的历史发展,随着实务经验的总结和认识观念的开放,由主合同无效、终止、解除等有限的独立性慢慢发展到更加完整的独立性。从历史发展和立法表述来看,现有的独立性立法规则缺乏正确原理的体系化构建,对独立性中涉及的仲裁条款的效力和生效判断依据的独立性混为一谈。仲裁条款的独立性理解应当回归合同效力规则中去分析,准确的认识应当为仲裁条款生效判断依据不独立和仲裁条款生效后完全独立。The development of arbitration clauses' independence, by the accumulation of the experience and with the open-mindedness of peo- ple, we established arbitration clauses' independence theory in the con- ditions when the contract is invalid, terminated, removed and some other terms to more and more completion. Depend on the development of history and the legislation, the sufficient arbitration clauses' independence needs having a structure upon the proper legal principles, because we have mixed up the potency of compromise clauses and the clues of the independence judgment. The understanding of arbitration clauses' inde- pendence should go back to the rules of contract effectiveness. The suit- able understanding is the judgment of the clues of arbitration clauses tak- ing effect is not independent and it will harvest full independence as soon as the arbitration clauses get potency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38