亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为量表的修订及信效度检验  

Reliability and Validity of Prosocial and Aggressive Driving Inventory

作　　者：马文瑶[1] 常若松[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁大连116029

出　　处：《人类工效学》2016年第6期7-10,共4页Chinese Journal of Ergonomics

摘　　要：目的修订驾驶员亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为量表并检验其信效度。方法采用中文版亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为量表对驾驶员进行测试,获得692份有效问卷。结果量表包括28个题目,分为2个维度,累计方差解释率为44.14%。量表的结构拟合度较好(CFI=0.90,TLI=0.92,RMSEA=0.051)。两个维度的内部一致性系数为0.87和0.90;与总分之间的相关系数为0.50和0.76,且Ps<0.001。2个维度与大五人格量表各维度之间部分相关显著,表明量表具有良好的相容效度。结论修订后的驾驶员亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为量表信度和效度较好,可以作为测量我国驾驶员亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为的一个可靠而有效的工具。Objective To revise the Prosoeial and Aggressive Driving Inventory （PADI） and test its reliability and validity among the Chinese drivers. Methods 692 drivers took the test. A final Chinese version of PADI was got after the item analysis, EFA and CFA. Results PADI consisted of 28 items, which was divided into two factors. The factors＇ratio of cumulative contribution was 44.14%. The indications of CFA met the requirements of psychomet- ric （ CFI = O. 90,TLI = 0.92, RMSEA = 0. 051 ）. The Cronbach＇s αof the two subscales were 0.87 and O. 90. Person correlation between the factors and the whole inventory were 0.50 and 0.76, all Ps 〈 0.001. The Person corre- lation between the two factors of PADI and the dimensions of Big Five inventory were significant, partly. Conclusion Revised PADI can be used as an effective and reliable tool for evaluatin~ drivers＇t）rosocial and a^aressive behavior.

关 键 词：驾驶员 驾驶行为 亲社会 攻击性 人格 交通安全 心理量表 交通违章 

分 类 号：B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]