论反诉当事人的扩张  

On the Expansion of the Parties of Counterclaim

作　　者：刘学在[1] 谷岩[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院

出　　处：《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第6期131-149,共19页Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心研究成果

摘　　要：反诉当事人的扩张制度可以发挥同一诉讼程序一并解决相关纠纷的优势,对提高诉讼效率、实现诉讼经济、防止裁判矛盾起着不可替代的作用。我国《民诉解释》第233条将反诉的当事人严格限定为本诉的当事人之范围,不利于当事人反诉权的平等保障和反诉独立性的保障,与我国民事诉讼法中的必要共同诉讼制度相冲突,容易造成裁判之间的矛盾,不符合纠纷解决之统一性的要求。未来应当允许被告以原告和第三人作为反诉共同被告而提起反诉,或者被告与第三人一起作为反诉共同原告而对本诉原告提起反诉,其重要条件是该"第三人"与原当事人一方之间具有"必要共同诉讼人"的关系。The expansion system of the parties of counterclaim is conducive to the solution to related disputes with the same litigation procedures, and plays an irreplaceable role in improving the litigation efficiency, reducing lawsuit costs and avoiding conflicting judgments. Article 233 of Judicial Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law of the People＇ s Republic of China stipulates that the parties of counterclaim are strictly confined to the parties of counterclaim in chief. The provision is not in favor of giving equal protection to the fight of counterclaim and safeguarding the counterclaim independence. Fur-thermore, it conflicts with the system of necessary joint action of the civil procedure law. It is pointed out that there exist some contradictions between judgments, which do not consist with the requirement of unified dispute resolution, and that it is necessary to allow the plaintiff and the third party to file a counterclaim against the defendant or the defendant and the third party to file a counterclaim against the common plaintiff. An important condition is that a relationship of ＂party in necessary co -litigation＂ exists between the third party and one of the prosecution clients.

关 键 词：反诉当事人 扩张 必要的共同诉讼人 诉讼经济 矛盾裁判 

分 类 号：C915.2[经济管理]