检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国药科大学,江苏南京211198 [2]中国医学科学院肿瘤医院,北京100021
出 处:《中国药物评价》2016年第6期510-513,共4页Chinese Journal of Drug Evaluation
摘 要:目的:分析肿瘤专科医院门诊患者单抗类抗肿瘤药超药品说明书使用情况,并初步分析用药的合理性。方法:选取2014年9月至2015年2月某院门诊患者单抗类药物处方,结合病案资料分析患者单抗类药物使用情况,查阅药品说明书、指南及相关文献分析超药品说明书用药情况及其合理性。结果:门诊单抗类药物处方1923张涉及568例患者,5种单抗类药物西妥昔单抗注射液、尼妥珠单抗注射液、贝伐珠单抗注射液、利妥昔单抗注射液、注射用曲妥珠单抗的应用与说明书的相符率分别为63.16%,21.54%,44.67%,75.82%,99.59%;超药品说明书用药主要表现在超适应证用药,适应证符合说明书和/或相关指南之和的比率分别为89.47%,21.54%,89.33%,95.60%,99.59%。结论:门诊患者单抗类药物的使用存在不同程度的超药品说明书用药,超药品说明书用药基本符合指南或有相关临床研究支持,总体用药情况基本合理。Objective: To investigate the off-label drug use of monoclonal antibody antineoplastic agents in outpatients in a cancer hospital and to analyze their rationality. Methods : Prescriptions of outpatients taking monoclonal antibody antineoplastie agents were selected from Sep. 2014 to Feb. 2015, and off-label drug use was analyzed according to the package inserts. Evidence supporting off-label drug use was searched in Guidelines, PubMed and Wangfang Data to evaluate the rationality. Results: Of total 1923 prescriptions that included 568 cases, the ratio of the usage of Cetuximab, Nimotuzumab, Bevacizumab, Rituximab and Trastuzumab consistent with package inserts is 63.16%, 21.54%, 44. 67% , 75.82% , 99. 59% respectively. The main type of off-label drug use was off-label indication. The indications consistent with package inserts or NCCN Guidelines was 89.47% ,21.54% ,89. 33% ,95.60% ,99. 59% respectively. Conclusion : The ratio of off-label drug use of monoclonal antibody antineoplastic agents was common and different from each other. Off-label drug use was supported by evidence in NCCN guidelines and other results of clinieal research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.81