检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹亚军[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学经济法学院
出 处:《法制与社会发展》2017年第1期68-80,共13页Law and Social Development
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目"民生视野下食品安全治理的法治化:问题嬗变与机制创新"(014ZDX028)的阶段性成果
摘 要:经济法的立法面临稳定性与回应性之间的紧张关系,学界一直在努力探求平衡,法典化仍被认为是主要出路之一,但现有的理论与实践并不如此。通过考察经济法立法发展的实践逻辑,一种由"理论导向"到"问题导向"的立法趋势清晰可见。大陆法与英美法在经济法域内趋于融合,"问题导向式立法"由此产生,"领域法学"理论也相应提出。"问题导向式立法"以问题为中心,发散地展开探索,综合考量相关因素并且选择合理的解决方案。此种强实践性品格的开放思维最早可追溯到论题学与论题学法学,并在当下的法学实证与理论研究中逐渐得以强化。然而长远来看,"问题导向式立法"及其"领域法学"仅是一种应用,其仍需以各学科理论的深化和体系化为基础。舍此,则可能危及法律权威地位,导致法律价值混乱和理论贫困。The legislation of economic laws is confronted with a tension between traditional codification of civil law and modem responsiveness to the dramatic changes of the social economic relations. Though the efforts to mollifying the contradictions are continuous and the codification gets more approvements, this runs counter to the actual situations. In the practice of China's legislation of economic law, a legislative trend from the "theory-oriented" to "topic-oriented" is clearly visible, and a combination of common law and civil law has been established. This is the topic-oriented legislation, which obviously concentrates on the practice, and focuses on issues, divergent exploration, comprehensive consideration of relevant factors and the choice of a reasonable solution. The thought above can trace back to the Topica and Topische Jurisprudenz, which accord with the present empirical characteristics of thought in China's study of law. In the long run, the topic-oriented legislation of economic law and the field laW would starve for the systemaltism and depth of theory, or else it may endanger the status of legal authority, and lead to the confusion of legal values and the theoretical poverty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.138.74