检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾心良
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《湖北理工学院学报(人文社会科学版)》2017年第1期5-10,共6页Journal of Hubei Polytechnic University(Humanities And Social Sciences)
摘 要:以行政法治视域之有限政府理论检视晚清工业化失败原因,不仅可以拓宽现有汉冶萍研究领域,还为透析晚清中国法治缺失补充了一个新样本,更可为当今市场经济条件下梳理政企关系提供历史借鉴。政府的不当干预直接推动了汉冶萍公司衰落覆亡,究其原因,晚清政府并没有达到有限政府理论的要求,表现在:一是政府行权目的是维护封建统治;二是政府权力没有受到合理制约;三是政府内部没有实行法治;四是不是有效政府。To exfumne the cause of the failure of industrifdization in the late Qing Dynasty in view of the limit-ed government theory in administrative law, can not only broaden the existing research fields of Hanyeping Steel and Iron Corporate, add a new sample for analyzing the lack of the rule of law in the late Qing Dynasty of Chi-na, but also provide historical reference on how to handle the relationship between government and enterprises in the current market economy. The decline of Hanyeping Steel and Iron Corporate was quickened by improper government intervention in the following four aspects: Firstly,the exercise of power by the government serves the purpose of defending the feudal rule; Secondly, the power of the government is not reasonably restricted; Thirdly, it is not a rule of law government;Lastly,it is not an effective government. All these show that the gov-ernment in the late Qing Dynasty did not meet the requirements of the limited government theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.85