底线或策略:“身体抗争”的行为逻辑——基于政策议程设置的视角  

Bottom Line or Strategy: Logic of the Body Fight Behavior in Contentions Politics:Based on the Perspective of Policy Agenda Setting

作　　者：王郅强[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学公共管理学院

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2017年第1期78-86,共9页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部重大攻关项目"我国社会治理体系构建及其运行机制研究"(16JZD026);广东省普通高校特色创新类项目"中国基层社会治理精细化与法治化研究"(2015WTSCX001)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：政策议程如何设置源于利益矛盾和利益冲突各方的力量对比和互动关系。利益相关者在现有制度化渠道缺失和难以奏效的前提下,常常通过对身体的运用和强调,将其作为底线或者策略来影响政策议程设置。通观近年来利益矛盾和冲突事件,身体抗争形式不鲜见,但呈现的趋势却逐渐由最初的底线走向策略选择,这对我国社会稳定与和谐秩序提出了十分严峻的挑战,必须要客观认识和积极应对。为此,本文在厘清身体抗争的内涵与特征的基础上,着重从身体抗争的可能性和可行性、可利用的外部支持条件、策略的有效选择项等方面分析其影响政策议程的行为逻辑,并指出以制度维权代替身体抗争才是走出目前维权困境的必然趋向。What decide how to set the policy agenda are the balance and the interactions be- tween the interest contradictions, Under the premise of the deficiency in the existing system channel, stakeholders often make influences in policy agenda setting through the use and emphasizes of the body, as the baseline or strategies. The form of body fight in the interest contradiction and conflict e- vents in recent years is common, but the trend has changed gradually from the initial baseline to the strategy selection, which challenged social stability and harmonious order seriously. Then we mustrecognize it objectively and respond to it actively. Therefore, after clarify the connotation and char- acteristics of body fight, this paper analyzes the behavioral logic influenced the policy agenda, in- cludes the possibility and feasibility of body fight, the outside available supportable conditions, a- vailable strategy options, etc. and then points out that the inevitable trend of safeguard rights is toinstead body fight by the system way.

关 键 词：利益矛盾 身体抗争 公民参与 政策议程设置 

分 类 号：D0-0[政治法律—政治学]