检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2017年第1期60-63,共4页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的观察迎随补泻法针刺下合穴治疗胃食管反流病的临床疗效。方法将61例胃食管反流病患者随机分为治疗组34例和对照组27例。治疗组采用迎随补泻法针刺下合穴进行治疗,对照组采用口服奥美拉唑肠溶片治疗。每日治疗1次,共治疗4星期。根据患者治疗前后症状评分比较两组临床疗效。结果治疗组总有效率为97.1%,对照组为85.2%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后6个月复发率为16.7%,对照组为50.0%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论迎随补泻法针刺下合穴是一种治疗胃食管反流病的有效方法 。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of reinforcing and reducing by acupuncturing at lower He-sea points along and against channel's direction in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Method Sixty-one GERD patients were randomized into a treatment group of 34 cases and a control group of 27 cases. The treatment group was intervened by reinforcing and reducing by acupuncturing at lower He-sea points along and against channel's direction, while the control group was treated with oral administration of Omeprazole tablets. The two groups were intervened once a day, 4 weeks in total. The clinical efficacies in the two groups were compared based on the symptoms scores before and after the treatment. Result The total effective rate was 97.1% in the treatment group versus 85.2% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). The relapse rate 6 months after the treatment was 16.7% in the treatment group versus 50.0% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Reinforcing and reducing by acupuncturing at lower He-sea points along and against channel's direction is an effective approach in treating GERD.
分 类 号:R246.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188