检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第35期105-106,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨粉刺去除术联合红蓝治疗面部痤疮的疗效。方法 200例面部痤疮患者随机分为治疗组与对照组,每组100例,分别采用粉刺去除术联合红蓝光及单用粉刺去除术治疗,对比两组的治疗效果。结果治疗组总有效率为96.0%,优于对照组总有效率77.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论粉刺去除术联合红蓝光治疗痤疮比单纯粉刺去除术治疗痤疮效果明显。Objective To discuss the effect of acne removal combined with red and blue light in the treatment of acne. Methods 200 cases of facial acne were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, 100 cases in each group. Acne removal combined with red and blue light and acne removal treatment were used. The treatment effect of two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the treatment group was 96.0%, better than the control group(77.0%), the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups was not statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion The effect of acne removal combined with red and blue light in the treatment of acne were obviously better than acne removal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28