检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴福初 徐寅 于昊天 蓝天[3] Wu Fuchu Xu Yin Yu Haotian Lan Tian(Department of Command, Naval Aeronautical Engineering Academy, Yantai 264001, China Department of Basic, Naval Aeronautical Engineering Academy, Yantai 264001, China Department of Campaign, Naval Command College, Nanjing 210016, China)
机构地区:[1]海军海空工程学院指挥系,山东烟台264001 [2]海军海空工程学院基础部,山东烟台264001 [3]海军指挥学院战役系,南京210016
出 处:《兵工自动化》2017年第1期76-79,共4页Ordnance Industry Automation
摘 要:针对采用不同战术行动方法时单舰检查反潜搜潜效能存在差异的问题,在分析单舰检查反潜战术行动方法及拖曳线列阵声纳战术使用特点的基础上,建立单舰3种典型战术行动方法下的检查反潜模型。结合潜艇运动模型与搜索概率及时间模型,利用蒙特卡罗方法进行仿真实验。仿真结果表明:相同仿真条件下,单舰采用包围方形搜索方法进行检查反潜的搜索概率及时间具有优越性。该结论对正确评估单舰反潜作战能力及合理运用反潜作战兵力具有十分重要的意义。Aiming at the problem that search effectiveness of single-ship checking anti-submarine with different tactical action methods exited differences, established three single-ship checking anti-submarine models with typical tactical action methods, by analyzing tactical action methods of single-ship checking anti-submarine and towed linear array sonar operation feature. Based on submarine motion models and searching probability and time models, this paper used the Monte Carlo method to simulate the process of checking anti-submarine. The results show that single-ship checking anti-submarine with bounding square search method has superiority under the same simulation conditions. The conclusion has great significance to correct assessment of single-ship anti-submarine operational capability and rational use of anti-submarine force.
分 类 号:TP391.92[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127