论专利纠纷行政调解协议司法确认的审查边界与救济路径  

On the Review Scope of Patent Disputes Administrative Mediation Agreement and the Remedies thereof

作　　者：何炼红[1,2] 舒秋膂 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院 [2]中南大学知识产权研究院 [3]长沙市岳麓区人民法院 [4]中南大学

出　　处：《知识产权》2017年第1期63-67,共5页Intellectual Property

基　　金：最高人民法院2015年度司法调研重大课题《关于专利法第四次修改中的重大问题研究》;中国法学会2015年度部级法学研究课题《知识产权纠纷调解救济机制研究》;法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台建设阶段性成果

摘　　要：专利纠纷行政调解协议司法确认机制是加强行政调解与司法程序衔接的有效路径,可以给予行政调解实质上的支持,从根本上解决非诉调解协议缺乏法律强制力的问题。法院在司法确认程序中,必须坚持"适度审查"的理念,采取"负面清单"的方式,明晰对行政调解协议的司法审查边界,凸显其特别程序的本质。同时应从虚假调解防治、协议瑕疵校正、裁定错误补救、无效宣告应对等方面构建多元化的救济机制。The judicial confirmation mechanism for patent disputes administrative mediation agreement is an effective way in strengthening the interface between the administrative mediation and judicial procedures. It gives substantial support to administrative mediation, and fundamentally resolves the problem that non-lawsuit mediation agreement being lack of legal force. In the judicial confirmation procedure, the court should stick to the principle of moderate review, adopt the ＂negative list＂ approach, clarify the judicial review scope of the administrative mediation agreement, and highlight the nature of the special procedures. Meanwhile, a diversified remedy mechanism should be constructed, to address the problems of false mediation, protocol flaw, adjudication errors and give proper response to patent invalidation.

关 键 词：专利纠纷行政调解 司法审查 负面清单 多元救济 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]