侵犯专利权民事责任归责原则适用考量  

A Research on the Application of the Liability Principle for Patent Infringement

作　　者：刘磊[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2017年第1期68-72,共5页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：追究侵害专利权的民事责任应当采用何种归责原则,历来是学界论争的中心问题之一。归纳来看,对关于侵犯专利权民事责任中的"停止侵害"责任适用无过错归责原则的认识较为一致,而对于"赔偿损害"责任归责原则的适用存在着完全不同的观点,其主要争议在于过错归责原则与无过错归责原则之间的选择。本文从专利权保护、专利制度目的实现以及维护社会正常生产秩序等角度对过错归责原则与无过错归责原则在侵犯专利权民事责任确定中的适用进行了对比,并提出了适用建议以及作为补充措施的侵犯专利权责任保险制度。It is highly debated over which liability principle should be applied in the patent infringement lawsuits. Generally speaking, it has reached a consensus that the non-fault liability principle should be applied to the ＂ceasing infringement responsibility＂ regarding patent infringement civil liability. While different opinions regarding the application of the liability principle exist concerning the ＂damage liability＂. The major controversy lies in the choice between the principle of fault liability and the principle of non-fault liability. The paper compares the application of the principles of fault liability and non-fault liability in determining the civil liability for patent infringement, in the perspective of patent right protection, the realization of the patent system purpose, and the maintenance of normal social production order.The article also provides suggestions for the application of above-mentioned principles and proposes patent infringement liability insurance system （PILIS） as supplementary means.

关 键 词：专利 侵权 归责原则 保险 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]