检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《云南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第1期18-25,共8页Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Social Science)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71203161);浙江省社科规划课题(15NDJC100YB);温州市哲学社会科学规划课题(16WSK052);浙江省大学生科技创新活动计划(2016R426070)
摘 要:政府主导型农技推广模式极大地推动了我国农业经济的发展,但在市场经济条件下这种模式难以继续推动我国农业的发展。以信息不对称视角,运用博弈论比较了政府主导型、龙头企业主导型以及合作社主导型三种农技推广模式和推广绩效。研究发现,合作社主导型农技推广模式对当前农业的进一步发展起到更大的推进作用,更加有利于当地农户的增产增收和我国当前"三农"问题的解决。Since the reform and opening up, the governments leading agricultural technology promo-tion mode greatly promoted the development of agricultural economy in China. However, with the de-velopment of the market-oriented economy, it is difficult for this mode to promote the further develop-ment of agriculture in our country. Based on the view of information asymmetry and interactive theory, this paper compares these below three modes which refer to government-leading, dominant enterprise- leading and agricultural cooperatives-leading to find out the pattern and performance of these three leading modes. The available studies have already found out that agricultural cooperatives-leading mode is playing a more important role in the generalizing of agro technique that provides better theoretical ba-sis for solving the current Three Rural.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.230.138