检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨瑷华[1]
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第1期56-60,共5页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
摘 要:当前在查办证券内幕交易罪案件中,普遍出现两个问题:一是公安侦查环节。公安机关没有履行主要的侦查职能,实际主要的侦查工作大多由证券监管行政部门完成。公安机关主要的工作变成核实和转化行政执法机关的证据;二是检察和审判环节。对于认定是否构成犯罪的关键事实,检察院和法院基本上放弃独立判断,主要依赖于证券监管行政部门的判断,而且在事实上又使刑事被告人对证券监管行政部门的判断无法进行质证。In current cases of investigating securities insider trading,two problems occurred generally as follows. Firstly,in the public security investigation,the investigation function was not performed by the public security organs. In fact,most of main investigation was performed by securities regulatory administrations. The main work of the public security organs became evidence of verification and conversion of administrative law enforcement organs. In the inspection and trail,with regard to key facts identified to be a crime or not,prosecutors and courts basically abandoned independent judgment,but mainly depended on the judgment made by securities regulatory administrations. However,in fact,the judgment made by securities regulatory administrations could not be cross- examinated by criminal defendants.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170