检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭亚辉[1] 刘亚红[1] 李婷[1] 吴建青[1] 朱小敏[1]
机构地区:[1]南京军区南京总医院神经内科,江苏南京210002
出 处:《现代临床医学》2017年第1期64-66,72,共3页Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨气道液体刺激在气管切开患者气道护理中的可行性及应用效果。方法:将90例气管切开患者随机分为试验1组、试验2组和对照组,每组30例,均进行常规气道护理。试验1组用20 m L注射器将0.45%Na Cl快速注入人工气道,试验2组用灭菌注射用水快速注入人工气道,进行气道灌洗,对照组则采用常规吸痰。结果:(1)试验组患者排痰效果优于对照组患者(P<0.05);(2)试验组患者痰液黏稠度低于对照组患者(P<0.05);(3)3组的血气分析pH值、PaO_2、SaO_2及心率、呼吸频率、血压等无显著性差异(均P>0.05)。结论:在气管切开患者护理中,气道适度的液体刺激能有效降低患者痰液黏稠度、痰痂形成及堵管的发生,优于单纯的吸痰和持续气道湿化法。Objective: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of airway liquid stimulation in tracheotomy patients were randomly divided into experimental group 1,experimental group 2 and control group,30 cases in eachgroup . They all received routine airway nursing. 0.45% saline of 20 mL was rapidly injected ilavage in experimental group 1 while sterile water for injection was rapidly injected into artificial airway in experimental group 2 ;conventional sputum suction was applied in the control group . Results: Both experimental groups selimination and lower sputum sticky than the control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). There were no significant differencesSaO2, HR,RR and BP among the three groups( P 〉 0. 05 ) . Conclusion: In the nurse of tstimulation can reduce sputum sticky,the formation of sputum scab and the occurrence of tube blockage. It is superior to simplesputum suction and continuous airway humidification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175