2008-2016年医疗纠纷第三方调解相关研究的回顾性分析  

Retrospective Analysis of Medical Dispute Third-Party Mediation Based on the Related Literatures from 2008 to 2016

作　　者：陈王涛 刘毅俊 李俊[1] 陶思宇[1] 方鹏骞[1] 乐虹[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院,湖北武汉430030 [2]武汉市卫生与计划生育委员会

出　　处：《中国卫生事业管理》2017年第1期39-41,共3页Chinese Health Service Management

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"基于全民健康覆盖的推进健康中国发展战略研究"(编号:15ZDC037)

摘　　要：目的:总结我国医疗纠纷第三方调解机制的研究现状和研究不足,分析发展中存在的问题,探索新的发展方向。方法:运用文献分析及其统计方法,收集、整理2008—2016年医疗纠纷非诉讼解决机制的研究文献,回顾性分析学者主要研究观点、研究内容及研究不足。结果:与传统医疗纠纷解决方式相比,第三方调解机制虽然具有一定优势,但在发展中由于专业化程度较低、调解作用发挥有限。结论:我国医疗纠纷第三方调解只有提高专业化水平,走专业化发展道路,发展成一种行业性、专业性的医疗纠纷权威处理平台,才能在医疗纠纷解决问题上发挥权威性作用。Objective Summarizing the current situation and problems of the third-party mediation of medical dispute in our country, and exploring the new development direction. Methods Combining literature survey and statistical methods, collect, sort the main point of the third-party Mediation related literature from 2008 to 2016. Results Compared with the traditional medical dis- pute resolution, the third-party mediation has certain advantages, but the mediation effect is limited because of the low degree of specialization. Conclusion Only if the third-party mediation improve professional level, take the path of professional development, establish a professional platform, can they playing an authoritative role to solve medical dispute.

关 键 词：医疗纠纷 非诉讼解决机制 第三方调解 发展方向 

分 类 号：R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]