检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《检验医学》2016年第B09期186-187,共2页Laboratory Medicine
摘 要:目的分析臂丛神经阻滞下针刀松懈治疗粘连性肩周炎的临床疗效。方法选取在本院接受治疗的粘连性肩周炎患者120例作为研究对象,随机数字表法将此120例患者分为观察组和对照组。在臂丛神经阻滞下,观察组采用针刀松懈治疗,对照组采用手法松懈治疗,并比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组的优良率为95.0%,对照组的优良率为55.0%,观察组明显优于对照组。结论臂丛神经阻滞下针刀松懈治疗粘连性肩周炎的临床疗效较手法松懈的治疗效果更好。Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy under brachial plexus block knife lax treatment of adhesive frozen shoulder. Methods In hospital treated 120 patients with frozen shoulder adhesive as research subjects, randomly this 120 patients divided into observation group and control group. In brachial plexus block, knife lax treatment observation group and the control group manipulation lax treatment, and clinical efficacy of the two groups of patients. Results The good was 95.0% in the control group was 55.0%, in the observation group than the control group. Conclusion the treatment of brachial plexus block under the clinical efficacy of the treatment of adhesive frozen knife lax than lax practices better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43