检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜小宁[1] 陈小宁[1] 祝靓靓[1] 张雅楠[1]
机构地区:[1]北京市海淀区卫生局卫生监督所,北京100037
出 处:《中国卫生监督杂志》2016年第6期515-518,共4页Chinese Journal of Health Inspection
摘 要:目的研究游泳池水质在线监测与现场快速检测结果及实验室检测结果的相关性,进而探讨以上3种检测方法在游泳池水质监测工作中的应用价值。方法选取北京市海淀区10家游泳场馆,分别采用以上3种检测方法对池水水温、余氯、浊度、p H值同时进行检测,并对90组检测结果进行配对t检验、相关、回归等统计学分析。结果通过实验数据分析表明,现场快速检测、在线监测与实验室检测结果之间差异均没有统计学意义;现场快速检测与实验室检测结果之间的线性相关程度高于在线监测与实验室检测结果之间的线性相关程度。结论在日常监督工作中,应合理使用3种检测方法,以实现工作效率最优化。Objectiv At present, three kinds of detection methods, including spot rapid detection, online monitoring and laboratory examination, are included in the swimming water hygienic inspection.Methods In this paper, we select 10 swimming venues in Haidian District, where the three detection methods are used for detecting water temperature, residual chlorine,turbidity,pH value at the same time. We use paired t tests, correlation analysis, and regression analysis for 90 sets of test results. Results There was no significant difference found either between spot rapid detection results and online monitoring results or between online monitoring results and laboratory examination results .Linear correlation coefficients showed that the degree of correlation between onsite rapid examination results and laboratory examination results was higher than that between online monitoring results and laboratory examination results .Conclusion In daily supervision, three kinds of detection methods should be used reasonably to realize the optimization of work efficiency.
分 类 号:R123.1[医药卫生—环境卫生学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30