检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万亿[1]
机构地区:[1]江西省南昌市洪都中医院手术室,南昌330006
出 处:《中国中医药现代远程教育》2016年第24期112-114,共3页Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
摘 要:目的研究循经刮痧联合拔火罐干预项痹症的临床效果。方法将76例项痹症的患者按随机数字法分为对照组和观察组,每组38例。对照组采用拔火罐治疗方法,观察组采用循经刮痧联合拔火罐干预,观察两组患者干预前后疼痛评分、临床症状和体征改善的情况及总有效率。结果观察组干预后疼痛评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05),临床症状和体征的改善明显优于对照组(P<0.01),差距具有统计学意义;观察组总体有效率为94.74%,对照组总体有效率为76.32%,观察组优于对照组。结论循经刮痧疗法联合拔火罐干预项痹症有明显疗效,适合临床推广。Objective To observe the clinical effect of scrapping therapy along the meridian system combined with fire cupping in the treatment of cervical spondylopathy. Methods 76 cases of patients with cervical spondylopathy were recruited and divided into the control group and the observation group according to the random number method, with 38 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received fire cupping therapy. Patients in the observation group were given scrapping therapy along the meridian system com-bined with fire cupping. The pain score, improvement of clinical symptoms and signs and the total effective rate before and after the intervention of the two groups was observed. Results The pain score of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group( P〈 0.05). The improvement of clinical symptoms and signs in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group(P〈 0.01), and the difference was statistically significant. The total effective rate of the observation group was 94.74% which was better than 76.32% of the control group. Conclusion The scrapping therapy along the meridian system com-bined with fire cupping in the treatment of cervical spondylopathy has significant effect, and is suitable for clinical promotion.
分 类 号:R244.4[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74