检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属宁德市医院神经外科,福建宁德352100
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2016年第24期208-209,共2页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的研究留置尿管在常规护理的前提下行膀胱冲洗与尿路感染的相关性,以确定对留置尿管的患者是否需要进行膀胱冲洗。方法 100例留置尿管患者随机分成试验组和对照组。试验组留置尿管后不进行膀胱冲洗,对照组留置尿管后每日用生理盐水250 ml膀胱冲洗2次,分别对两组患者不同时期的尿液常规检查结果进行分析。结果膀胱冲洗组感染阳性率11%,非膀胱冲洗组感染阳性率11%,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论两组感染发生率未见显著差别,但应根据不同的感染途径,采用相对应的护理措施,可以显著有效减少尿路感染的发生率。Objective To study the correlation between bladder irrigation and urinary tract infection with indwelling catheter in the premise of routine nursing,and to determine whether the patients with indwelling catheter need to be bladder irrigated. Methods 100 cases of patients with indwelling catheter,which were randomly divided into control group and test group. The control group did not accept bladder irrigation after indwelling catheter,and the test group accepted 2 times daily with normal saline 250 ml bladder irrigation after indwelling catheter. The results of routine urine examination in 2 groups of patients were analyzed respectively. Results The positive rate of bladder irrigation group was 11%,and the positive rate of infection in non bladder irrigation group was 11%. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion The infection rates in two groups were not significant respectively, but using relative deserved nursing measures based on different infection effectively reduce the incidence of urinary tract infection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28